"Invitational rhetoric is an invitation to understanding as a means to create a relationship rooted in equality, immanent value, and self-determination."
Are there any flaws in approaching rhetoric this way? The issue with Quintillian views are that they're naive in assuming that there's no such thing as an ulterior motive, but with invitational rhetoric the focus is on working towards a good moral center. Does that absolve it from issues?
No comments:
Post a Comment